I don’t generally bother with. My usual view is that, like any other extended warranty, it offers poor value for money. You’re paying a lot of money upfront for coverage you’ll likely never need. Most Mac faults are going to make themselves known well inside the first year of standard Apple warranty coverage. The likelihood of a major fault occurring in the interval between the standard warranty expiring and AppleCare doing the same is very low. (There’s an additional factor at play in the EU, which I’ll get to later as it won’t be relevant to U.S. Readers.) But I am opting for it this time. Because the is not only, but also pretty much non-repairable.
![Worth Worth](http://image1.cc-inc.com/pcm/marketing/apple/Apple_Brand_Page_AppleCare_for_Mac_01.jpg)
Welcome to Mac Help where discuss anything Apple related or seek expert tech support. Please join our friendly community by clicking the button below - it only takes a few seconds and is totally free. AppleCare protection plans for Mac computers are a bit more expensive, but they tack on an extra year compared to the iPhone and iPad. Looking at the $249 AppleCare protection plan for the MacBook Air and 13-inch MacBook Pro, it’s a plan that’s well worth it.
Rated it a 1/10 for repairability, noting the glued-down 5-cell battery, the extreme difficulty in removing the Touch Bar component (they actually broke it during removal) and pointing out that even the most trivial of faults could get massively expensive. Because the Touch ID sensor doubles as the power button, which pairs with the Apple T1 chip on the logic board, fixing a broken power switch will likely require replacing the entire logic board. Similarly, because both RAM and SSD chips are soldered-in, a failure with either would likewise require a whole new logic board. Oh, and that lovely new display? Bonded into the lid of the machine.
In short, DIY and third-party repairs are not going to be practical, and an Apple repair is likely to be extremely costly. For once, that to protect a 15-inch MacBook Pro looks like a smart move. Things are a little less clear-cut for those who live in an EU country. EU law says that manufacturers must guarantee products against manufacturing defects for a. In the UK, the law goes even further, stating that products must last for a ‘reasonable’ time, and that this could – in some cases – be. (Here, what is considered ‘reasonable’ depends on both the product type and the price paid. Home appliances are expected to last longer than laptops, for example, and premium brands longer than budget ones.) However, in both EU and UK law the operative phrase is ‘manufacturing defects.’ This means you could be placed in a position where Apple says the fault was not present at the time of sale and therefore only the 1-year Apple warranty applies.
Unless you can prove otherwise (and how would you?), you may be left out of luck. So for me at least, with my, I’m handing over the cash for one more dongle: an AppleCare policy.
Back in 2006, I wrote a column titled “” In it, I weighed the pros and cons of purchasing AppleCare when buying a Mac. I strongly recommended against getting Apple’s extended warranty: “AppleCare is almost always a bad choice.” With the 2011 holiday season upon us, many many many people will be getting Apple products as gifts over the next few weeks. They will all have to decide whether or not to purchase AppleCare for their new devices. As such, it seemed like a good time to reconsider the merits of AppleCare — this time with a focus on iOS devices (iPhone, iPad and iPod touch). My conclusion remains essentially the same: for iOS devices, and especially for iPhone, are still a bad bet.